Weather ◊ Travel ◊ What the Papers Say ◊ TV Guide

Site search
Web search
Home
What's new ?
Business
Galleries
Memories
History
Community
Out & About
Genealogy
Links
Guestbook

 

History

 

Order for removal of Thomas and Millicent May from Nottingham to Whiston

 

 

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of King's Bench

The KING v The Inhabitants of WHISTON i it is to be pre iRDER for the removal of Thomas May and Millicent his wife and their Cbee gUa 1 three children from St Mary Nottingham to Whiston On appeal the to the over Sessions confirmed the order subject to the following case The pauper a which parish boy o an legacy settled in the township of Dinnington in the West Riding apprentice is of the county of York was in December 1818 pursuant to an order of two to 56 G O 3 c justices of the said riding bound apprentice by the churchwardens and over 1.19 2 before seers of the poor of Dinnington to James Herring residing within the town made by the ship of Whiston in the same riding by indenture duly signed and allowed justices and it is ft therein mentioned and served the said James Herring under the bound according ai 1 ii iiiiit not necessary for a party who said indenture for more than forty days in the said township of Whiston deatureat the Tne township of Dinnington is about five miles from the township of Whiston Sessions to prove Each township maintains its own poor separately and both townships are tas bmfg veo within the same county and within the jurisdiction of the peace of the two c Such notice magistrates who made the order for the binding and who afterwards signed ssary t ieir allowance of the indenture On the hearing of the appeal at the General Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the town and county of Nottingham the respondents refused to call evidence to prove that notice was given by the overseers of the poor of Dinnington to the overseers of the poor of Whiston of their intention to bind out such apprentice No evidence having been offered by the appellants to prove that such notice was not given the question for the opinion of the Court was whether the respondents were bound to prove that notice was given under the circumstances above stated
Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of King's Bench and in ... By Samuel Bealey Harrison, Frederick Luard Wollaston, Great Britain Court of King's Bench, Great Britain Bail Court, Court of King's Bench, Bail Court, Great Britain

« History Index